Higher Dimensional Travel
Sven Gelbhaar
3/26/2018
Hello dear reader,
I had previously written an expose on higher dimensional travel. For some odd
reason I cant find this in my online repository; so here we go once more with
added information.
One of the most influential and ubiquitous scientific theories now in existence
is called string theory. String theory presupposes that there are more than just
our 4 spatial and temporal dimensions. I maintain that if we were in a 4 spatial
dimensions world that we would know about it.
Counterargument one: gravity in general relativity presupposes gravity to prove
gravity. We’ve dealt with this before with the analogy of a pillow holding a
bowling ball and several smaller balls with less mass in close proximity to the
bowling ball. In this analogy the bowling ball is bending space time,
represented in this analogy as the pillow. Naturally once the little balls get
close to the bowling ball on the pillow they have a tendency of falling in. This
falling in is the result–not the cause–of gravity. They are using gravity to
explain gravity; I’m not aware of any meta- gravity which would act as gravity
acts in this analogy. You cannot use your conclusion in your premises.
Another thing to note and be cognizant of: if space in a
three-dimensional coordinate system were in fact warped (that is: to expand and
contract) then this would make no difference whatsoever to anyone traveling
through said three-dimensional space. All it would do if traveling through a
higher dimension were in fact possible is move bodies of mass closer together
statically; which is to say there would not be constant acceleration there would
be little warping, a little wrinkle in space and time that will bring them closer
together because now the space time is smaller or compressed in both directions
between both of the objects. Again, this would result in said objects simply
appearing closer together as the space around them compresses, but unless one
is looking at it from an objective perspective (viz.: a higher spatial dimension
which resists this warping itself) this would be imperceptible.
Let’s take a step back and focus on what we know to be facts. I ask you, dear
reader, if there are truly one dimensional objects in empirical corporeal
existence? I maintain that there aren’t. They might exist in our minds but our
minds are merely maps of the real thing and people can add whatever they want
to this map, it doesn’t change reality. So let’s continue down this road: are
there any truly two-dimensional objects in our three-dimensional world? The
answer is obviously a big no. We have yet to run into an
object that has no depth, or no length, or no height. This is to say that if
there were higher spatial dimensions which could be traversed that we would
already know about it. We would be interacting, not even intentionally, with
higher dimensional aspects of our world as we perceive it.
So let’s say that there is at least one higher spatial dimension. How do we
know? It’s hard to send things off into direction that we are not familiar with;
luckily there are things called collisions which drive matter into every
conceivable direction in three-dimensional space. If collisions do this in
three-dimensional space, that makes it the default that all the constituent
collided particles would go into every conceivable direction including the
higher spatial dimensions, Should they exist. So the question is do we lose
matter in our three-dimensional plane of existence every time a car collides
every time a GammaRay hits the atmosphere or the magnetosphere. Thankfully we as
a species spends roughly US$10 billion to build the CERN supercollider. What I
would do if I were in charge of said supercollider is look for an attrition
particles or sub particles with each and every collision. If nothing is lost
then it should be a rather convincing experiment to disapprove higher spatial
dimensions. Do please recall that in collisions of matter is driven into every
which way, in all directions. So why don’t we lose matter on our
three-dimensional plane as we are forth spatially dimensional objects
supposedly? Because there are no higher spatial dimensions.