Matter and Antimatter
Sven Gelbhaar
9/16/2017
Antimatter was thought up by Arthur Schuster in the late 1890s. He conjectured
that matter with electrical polarities reversed (positive electrons and negative
protons) might also exist, and that this would allow for antigravity. The
physics community took off with this idea and pushed for empirical tests for
this type of (unbaryonic) matter. They conducted several tests and then
inferred that there indeed exists this sort of phenomenon. It would have been
entirely too easy if it were directly observable, but if one adds a lot of
assumptions and interpretations onto actual events, you’ll eventually find
(evidence for) what you’re looking for.
It is speculated that whole galaxies are actually comprised of antimatter. The
problem with this is that antimatter galaxies look and cohesively behave the
same as normal matter. Furthermore there was a box with ionization detectors
to observe matter vs antimatter, but simple interactions between normal/baryonic
matter could explain those results. I can’t seem to be able to find anything
on this in the recent past; info would be appreciated. Alternatively, there
are rumors that there are antimatter clouds around our galactic center. All
this is derived from phenomena that can be explained by the presence of ordinary
matter. Again, no joy/luck.
The most persuasive argument is that particle accelerators can and do bring
antimatter into existence, but this is not observed with emitted gamma rays from
matter&antimatter collisions as per the literature that I’ve read. That’s not
even taking the supposed antigravity we hoped for. Again, if you’re looking for
ghosts you’re gonna see them a lot more than with casual observations.
On the topic of anti gravity and it’s reconciliation with my /Atomic Theory of
Gravity/, ATG stipulates that antigravity would not occur. Protons and
antiprotons, having more voltage (attraction in this case) would quickly
collide and intermingle with one another due to electric theory. So there’s no
hope in matter & antimatter interaction in and of itself. Naturally their
attraction could be harnessed in ways outlined by my patent.
So we’re left with no definitive proof of antimatter existing, but we can keep
hoping. As an added bonus, I’ll let you ponder the implications of matter &
antimatter annihilating to form one or more photons, and the conclusion of /The
Photo-electric Theory/ I published earlier. Said equivalence would imply an
asymmetry in matter/antimatter as photons are shown to be unbounded electrons,
which are considered normal matter. As always, let me know what you think in
the comments or email.